San Francisco reparations proposal makes waves: ‘America must admit its sin’

The debate over reparations is just beginning. Come July, the controversy will kick into high gear when the California Reparations Task Force slaps a price tag on reparations and lawmakers and Gov. Newsom debate how to pay for it. Despite the sticker shock, other blue states and some Congressional Democrats may follow.

“California’s reparations will be the boilerplate,” says board member Reginald Jones-Sawyer. “They’re going to take our blueprint and start with that to determine what national reparations will be.”

In a 500-page interim report, the 9 member California task force details what it considers 300 years of repression and discrimination for which Black Americans deserve compensation. It cites government policies, Jim Crow laws and redlining for causing the wealth gap between white and black communities.

“America must admit its sin,” says Rev. Amos Brown, a member of the San Francisco committee proposing to pay each black resident up to $5 million each in reparations. “Atone for it and act in terms of providing concrete measures that would pay back for the wrong that was done.”


The solution: Comprehensive reparations to prevent African Americans from becoming trapped in poor housing, polluted neighborhoods and failing schools.

“Reparations is something promised and something owed,” says committee member and State Senator Steven Bradford.

The state commission, created by legislation signed by Newsom in 2020, has yet to put a price on reparations, but the recommended remedy for housing discrimination alone topped $560 billion, or $223,000 for each qualifying descendent of a Black living in the US prior to 1900 now residing in California state.

Eligibility for the San Francisco payout is slightly different. You must be 18, identify as Black or African American for at least ten years. Alternatively, you could be born in the city between 1940 and 1996. A connection to slavery is not necessary. You may qualify for reparations by being “personally or the direct descendant of someone incarcerated by the failed war on drugs”. The plan also calls on the city to supplement lower-income recipients’ income to reflect the Area Median Income (AMI), about $97,000, annually for at least 250 years.

“The idea of reparations in California is nuanced,” says San Francisco task force member.

Prof. James Taylor from the University of San Francisco. “It’s not Georgia, this is not Alabama where Blacks were held in chains. Blacks came here because it was a free state yet when they got here the contradiction is there was still racial prejudice.”

Some argue California reparations are more about social justice than slavery, since California was not a slave owning state during the Civil War. Militias here were multi-ethnic, and regiments fought on behalf of the Union, pushing Confederate soldiers out of Arizona and New Mexico back to Texas. It also gets complicated when trying to separate Blacks of African descent from the Caribbean or nations complicit in the slave trade. Still, several progressive cities – Boston, Providence, Amherst, Mass., Evanston, Illinois, St. Louis and St. Paul, Minn. all have appointed task forces exploring how to pay reparations to Black Americans.

“Reparations isn’t charity, it’s not a gift,” says Trahern Crews of the St. Paul Reparations Advisory Committee in Minnesota. “It’s something that’s owed, it’s a debt for 400 years of slavery.”


How to pay for it and what is politically realistic is something else.

San Francisco faces a $728 million dollar deficit, yet its reparations committee also proposes forgiving home mortgages, student loans and credit card debt because “black households have costlier or riskier debt”.

The city has 44,000 black residents, if even half qualify for reparations experts put the price tag over $100 billion. Blacks compose just 5% of San Francisco, compared to 34% Asian and 15% Latino, neither group is likely to concede they experienced less hardship in the US than African Americans. Nationwide, black households have a median wealth of $24,100, and Hispanics at $36,000 compared to white households median wealth of $188,200, according to the Federal Reserve Board Survey of Consumer Finances.

The city is 45% white. A Pew Research poll in November found nationally 80% of whites oppose reparations, although Democrats nearly split equally on the question.

“This is not blacks trying to get something from white in terms of begging and borrowing. This is about these states injury and handicaps placed on people going back decades and centuries,” says Taylor. “Locally, this is about — not slavery at all. It’s all about discrimination, housing, other forms of discrimination around labor and jobs.”

Financially, California is not much better off, facing a $25 billion shortfall. Is it politically realistic to hand over billions when the state hasn’t built a dam in 40 years, it’s public schools rank 48th in the nation, it is home to 1/3 of the nation’s welfare recipients and ranks #1 in homeless population. I posed that question to state Assemblyman Reginald Jones-Sawyer, who is on the state reparations task force. He does not expect one time, lump sum payout, rather a bond, new taxes or a new revenue source that generates income over time.

“I believe justifying the number is one step that’s really important,” he said. “And then coming up with a methodology of how to pay for it that makes sense to most, if not all Americans, will overcome that. As long as you’re able to not only justify it, but come up with a credible plan that makes sense over a period of time, that could assuage a lot of what you call a sticker shock.”


Jones-Sawyer believes the California debate will be enough to spur other states. Democrats in Congress considered a bill last year by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas that sought reparations and a national apology for slavery. It would have set up a commission to “examine slavery and discrimination in the colonies and the United States from 1619 to the present and recommend appropriate remedies, but it died in committee. With Republicans currently in control of the House, that effort is likely dead.

Source –

For consideration of being featured on WallstreetPR, contact:

Please make sure to read and completely understand our disclaimer at FOR EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY; NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. Any content posted on our website is for educational and informational purposes only and should NOT be construed as a securities-related offer or solicitation, or be relied upon as personalized investment advice. WallStreetPR strongly recommends you consult a licensed or registered professional before making any investment decision. Neither nor any of its owners or employees is registered as a securities broker-dealer, broker, investment advisor (IA), or IA representative with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, any state securities regulatory authority, or any self-regulatory organization. WallStreetPR often gets compensated for advertisement services that are disclosed on our disclaimer located at